John Brandt
John Brandt
  • Видео 57
  • Просмотров 510 612
Building a studio || Tips for Building a studio || jh brandt
Building a studio? Here are some tips...
Hurdles and roadblocks. Friends helping. Contractors - who to hire and who to look out for. HVAC and noise.
Related Keyword:
Acoustic Engineering, Sound Architecture, Noise Control Specialist, Auditory Space Design, Acoustic Consultancy, professional recording studios, home theatres, Dolby Atmos, EFFICIENT ACOUSTICS, jh brandt, Custom Acoustic Solutions, Professional Sound Design, Sound Absorption Design, Acoustic Treatment Specialist, Environmental Noise Solutions, Studio Acoustic Solutions, Indoor Acoustic Planning, Building a studio, Tips for Building a studio, jh brandt
Просмотров: 781

Видео

Conversation with Dario Kostinger about Studio room treatment
Просмотров 9168 месяцев назад
You CAN DIY your treatment. We talk about his studio build and typical issues. Links discussed in the video www.ursa.at/ursa-glaswolle www.ursa.at/ka www.byggmakker.no/kategori/trelast-og-byggevarer/isolasjon/bygningsisolasjon www.thomann.de/at/the_t.akustik_pro_series_og_diffusor.htm www.recordingthemasters.com/ Related Keyword: Studio room treatment, Acoustic Engineering, Sound Architecture, ...
Meeting with Raul Cuellar Riff Audio about Studio Building pt2
Просмотров 4279 месяцев назад
Yes, tracking rooms (live rooms) need treatment. There's more than what you see in a good tracking space. We talk about how it works. Studios and tracking rooms as quality tools. - They won't make you better, necessarily but they WILL help you do the job faster, easier, and have more fun while you're doing what you do. ACCURATE & EFFICIENT ACOUSTICS World-class, full-service acoustics and audio...
Meeting with Raul Cuellar Riff Audio about Studio Building pt1
Просмотров 7359 месяцев назад
Raul and I talk about his design and how it worked for him. He discusses problems he encountered and how they were solved. ACCURATE & EFFICIENT ACOUSTICS World-class, full-service acoustics and audio/ video design company specializing in recording studios, critical listening, and viewing environments. JOHN H. BRANDT, ACOUSTIC DESIGNER Providing full-service building designs for the music and fi...
Voice Over Booths || Peter Rein pt2 || JOHN H. BRANDT || ACOUSTIC DESIGNER
Просмотров 2669 месяцев назад
We talk about common questions about booths vs. whole room treatment. ACCURATE & EFFICIENT ACOUSTICS World-class, full-service acoustics and audio/ video design company specializing in recording studios, critical listening, and viewing environments. JOHN H. BRANDT, ACOUSTIC DESIGNER Providing full-service building designs for the music and film industry. Designing acoustic solutions for private...
Voice Over Booths || Peter Rein pt1 || ACOUSTIC DESIGNER || JOHN H. BRANDT
Просмотров 4279 месяцев назад
Why build a booth? Use a room to your advantage. ACCURATE & EFFICIENT ACOUSTICS World-class, full-service acoustics and audio/ video design company specializing in recording studios, critical listening, and viewing environments. JOHN H. BRANDT, ACOUSTIC DESIGNER Providing full-service building designs for the music and film industry. Designing acoustic solutions for private and professional rec...
Bass Trap Presentation
Просмотров 2,9 тыс.10 месяцев назад
Richard Lenz of Realacoustix and I talk about diaphragmatic absorbers, testing, and the scientific process.
Conversation about Diaphragmatic Absorbers | Lab Testing | and How Sound Works | part 1
Просмотров 1,3 тыс.10 месяцев назад
Conversation about Diaphragmatic Absorbers | Lab Testing | and How Sound Works | part 1
Lobbing in Diaphragmatic Absorbers, VPRs, and Theories
Просмотров 85810 месяцев назад
We talk about what was learned during very low-frequency testing in the world's largest reverberation room.
Schroeder Frequency, Room Software, Law, Physics, and Science
Просмотров 80511 месяцев назад
We discuss several subjects that might be of interest to you... at least it might be entertaining. Enjoy!
What does it take to void good Isolation
Просмотров 48711 месяцев назад
We talk about soundproofing - Building Isolation and what it takes to ruin it.
Sound Prediction Software
Просмотров 45011 месяцев назад
What is wrong with simulation software? How does it know...?
Helmholtz Resonators in Studios
Просмотров 98111 месяцев назад
Should you use a Helmholtz resonator in your studio tracking room or mixing room?
Why is Modal Distribution Important
Просмотров 60811 месяцев назад
Do you want to work in one little spot or would you like to be able to work in the whole room?
Ray region or Wave region
Просмотров 40211 месяцев назад
What frequency region is most important to consider when treating a room?
What About the Bass
Просмотров 1,6 тыс.11 месяцев назад
What About the Bass
Do Certain Materials Work Better in Particular Room Positions for Acoustics
Просмотров 1,4 тыс.11 месяцев назад
Do Certain Materials Work Better in Particular Room Positions for Acoustics
Fix the Time or Fix the FR
Просмотров 58311 месяцев назад
Fix the Time or Fix the FR
How Soundproof Can We Get
Просмотров 88911 месяцев назад
How Soundproof Can We Get
Lab Testing vs Real World
Просмотров 26611 месяцев назад
Lab Testing vs Real World
Impedance Tube Measurements
Просмотров 42111 месяцев назад
Impedance Tube Measurements
Air Gap behind absorbers
Просмотров 1,9 тыс.11 месяцев назад
Air Gap behind absorbers
Live Venue and Studio design discussion
Просмотров 628Год назад
Live Venue and Studio design discussion
MASTER CLASS IN AUDIO SESSION 9 FT RON SAURO AND JOHN BRANDT
Просмотров 1,3 тыс.Год назад
MASTER CLASS IN AUDIO SESSION 9 FT RON SAURO AND JOHN BRANDT
MASTER CLASS IN AUDIO SESSION 9 FT RON SAURO AND JOHN BRANDT
Просмотров 2,4 тыс.Год назад
MASTER CLASS IN AUDIO SESSION 9 FT RON SAURO AND JOHN BRANDT
How to build a studio grade microphone 10 of 10
Просмотров 2,2 тыс.6 лет назад
How to build a studio grade microphone 10 of 10
How to build a studio grade microphone 9 of 10
Просмотров 6586 лет назад
How to build a studio grade microphone 9 of 10
How to build a studio grade microphone 8 of 10
Просмотров 5046 лет назад
How to build a studio grade microphone 8 of 10
How to build a studio grade microphone 7 of 10
Просмотров 4746 лет назад
How to build a studio grade microphone 7 of 10
How to build a studio grade microphone 2 of 10
Просмотров 1,2 тыс.6 лет назад
How to build a studio grade microphone 2 of 10

Комментарии

  • @AGILISFPV
    @AGILISFPV 12 дней назад

    This is such great advice. Thank you for this video.

  • @mourlyvold64
    @mourlyvold64 2 месяца назад

    Thank you, mr. Lenz. Thank you, mr. Brandt. Greetings from the Netherlands.

  • @swampweed833
    @swampweed833 2 месяца назад

    and what are anechoic chambers made out of? what is NRC and how and why was it developed? Complete misinformation and lack of understanding of basic physics not even knowing how sound absorption works. if rockwool didn't work then bass traps wouldn't exist and neither would recording studios or anechoic chambers.

  • @JonathanWesleyMusic
    @JonathanWesleyMusic 2 месяца назад

    This was just absolutely amazing! Thank you Karthick, Marzban, Ron & John for doing this!

  • @yotamlifshitz
    @yotamlifshitz 2 месяца назад

    8:40 hey John, could you elaborate on that matter? the multiplication of the schroeder frequency by the √2.. what is that frequency tells us? We want to avoid resonances specifically below that frequency, but why this frequency and not above?

  • @JonathanWesleyMusic
    @JonathanWesleyMusic 2 месяца назад

    Wow, Was Ron saying that air-gaps for absorbers aren't necessary?

  • @audiomez
    @audiomez 3 месяца назад

    I’ve been doing this for 40 years and the challenge of HVAC always is intimidating & evolving. But like your short answer: “turn it off” between 30 minute sessions. Then crank it up or down for the break. Iv’e tried mini splits, tapered and baffled ducts, individual room self contained and on and on. It inevitably comes back to “turn it off”.

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 3 месяца назад

      I design forced air systems that result in NR10 Noise levels. A proper forced air Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning system is a LARGE part of the studio acoustics. Fresh air Ventilation is often overlooked.

  • @audiomez
    @audiomez 3 месяца назад

    Has any research been undertaken, investigating textile composite fiber blends (dare I say it), for example two layered composite fiber with a concentration of carbon on the forward dimension with wool woven on the reverse side. Published data shows significant bass absorption to 40hz in low freq. and significant rejection of high mid, high and transient frequencies?

  • @user-ij7fd3km9b
    @user-ij7fd3km9b 3 месяца назад

    @JHBrandt for a room of that size (and with the PMC monitors specifically) would you consider soft flush mounting them? PMC claims that their monitors have ultra-wide dispersion so the sweetspot area is larger, plus they have their ATL bass-loading technology -- well, they make some nice claims all around: extended accurate bass even at low volume, etc. I have the newer version of those monitors, the result6 (in a similar sized small room) hence why I'm so curious if flush-mounting was considered at all for this project or not, and if it was considered what made you go with free standing speakers in the end? Also, could you explain what's behind the prime 17 primitive root open back diffraction panels? Is it possible to place the limp bag traps with an absorption layer inbetween behind these pass-through diffraction panels, to treat different frequency ranges and achieve a more open space sound in a small room, all at once? Do you still use other types of membrane traps (perhaps targeting a more specific bass frequency) in a room with the limp bag traps as part of the design, or generally there should be no need for this? Thank you so much! Love your work.

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 3 месяца назад

      Thank you! Client preference... besides those are very small speakers. Rear wall diffraction/phase-change units HAVE absorption behind them. The devil is in the details.

  • @audiomez
    @audiomez 3 месяца назад

    In lieu of a poured concrete slab have you ever encountered the use of “tile” like patio paving bricks to create increase🎉mass

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 3 месяца назад

      yes, we've done that a few times.

  • @michaelangell9535
    @michaelangell9535 3 месяца назад

    Hey John. Where do vents go? Can we put ventilation baffles inside the wall cavities? Like in-between a double wall system? I will end up with a 3 foot space between ceiling and roof and I want to use this space for air transfer while isolating sound as much as possible. Bad idea?

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 3 месяца назад

      A very good question, sir. If you have a two-partition assembly, you will need baffles and attenuation of sound on each side of the partitions. The baffles will extend the mass of the partition while using absorbing material in the ducts along with pressure-changing cavities in the baffles to further attenuate sound. Wherever air goes, so goes sound. The space between the partitions must not be coupled with anything rigid like galvanized ducting. Use flexible connectors. This is common for HVAC systems to prevent vibrations from following the lines.

    • @michaelangell9535
      @michaelangell9535 3 месяца назад

      So snaking 6 feet(or so) of insulated flexible ducting through a large ceiling cavity would not be enough. I would want baffle boxes on both side. One on each side of partition for both intake and out take. That would be four baffle boxes?> @@JHBrandt

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 3 месяца назад

      @@michaelangell9535 It really depends on the situation and design. That is what I have done in many builds. And we have no problems with sound transfer. Your method may work well for your situation. I don't know.

  • @mindfulnesshaven8732
    @mindfulnesshaven8732 4 месяца назад

    Thanks so much for all the great content John. Invaluable resource here! Quick question for you, I'm trying to find the Owens Corning Pink 8" material you are speaking of. I am in the US so that should be easy but I can't track it down but I can’t locate it. Is there another name for this perhaps? Do you possibly have a link?

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 4 месяца назад

      Only this - www.owenscorning.com/en-us/insulation/pink-next-gen-fiberglas It's available in most big-box stores.

  • @michaelangell9535
    @michaelangell9535 4 месяца назад

    In a 2x4 double stud system I'm not filling the bay completely. I just want it in against one side. Do recommend faced or un-faced insulation in this application? Seems like faced won't sag..

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 4 месяца назад

      Faced. Easier to deal with and install. The vapor barrier may or may not be required but will not interfere with the acoustic properties of the construction.

    • @michaelangell9535
      @michaelangell9535 4 месяца назад

      @@JHBrandt I'm planning on the ceiling also being a double stud system using 2x6's. How do I get the R19 to press firmly against the upper drywall? I can staple it close in.. but would it compress, pull away or sag with time?. How important is contact with drywall?

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 4 месяца назад

      @@michaelangell9535 the insulation doesn't need to press against the drywall. It only needs to be in the ceiling cavity.

    • @michaelangell9535
      @michaelangell9535 4 месяца назад

      @@JHBrandt Thank you! Vary helpful. Here's the $6000 dollar question. Will a double stud system allow a rock band to play till 9pm in a residential neighborhood? Some internet people say it does NOTHING for frequencies bellow 125hz. Im reaching out to people with practical experience.

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 4 месяца назад

      @@michaelangell9535 we should talk. DIY design fails 99% of the time. My email is john@jhbrandt.net

  • @michaelangell9535
    @michaelangell9535 4 месяца назад

    WOW.. so how would you hang second layer of dry wall? Just glue or double sided tap?

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 4 месяца назад

      you have to do some construction... use screws, plaster, and paper tape. Then prime and paint.

  • @reaxions
    @reaxions 4 месяца назад

    Listening to you guys talk through various challenges and solutions was very informative, as I continue to build out my home theater acoustic treatments. Upon doing my research, I'd actually been really curious about the seemingly prominent use of space couplers over studio desks, which you addressed as creating a diffractive cloud that helps to mask studio desk reflections. That was invaluable, so thanks for that! I'm curious why space couplers don't seem to be used as much in home theater applications over seating areas, ottomans, etc. Any thoughts on that? Thanks again!

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 4 месяца назад

      Thanks for the questions. In a theater environment, a sense of space should come from the sound source or movie soundtrack. The room acoustic should be a neutral canvas on which the soundtracks are painted. Theater seats are normally quite absorptive and require no masking. Those are my thoughts and opinion. 😁

  • @manny_f
    @manny_f 5 месяцев назад

    Learnt about Ron Sauro yesterday, he certainly has a few stories to tell 😮

  • @texast2595
    @texast2595 5 месяцев назад

    Awesome content!! Liked, subscribed and now binge watching to catch up. I'd be extremely interested to hear your and Ron's opinion on Acoustic Fields diaphragmatic absorber with their carbon technology, they claim to absorb down to 30hz and even lower if you go thicker. Do either of you have experience with them? I just looked into Real Acoustix and saw they are next door to me in Ogden Utah, I live in Logan, so that's awesome.

  • @natdenchfield8061
    @natdenchfield8061 5 месяцев назад

    Is there a part two ? Thanks!

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 5 месяцев назад

      Not yet! :D

  • @nickc63
    @nickc63 5 месяцев назад

    I have been told that Mineral wool attenuates lower frequencies better than the equivalent amount of fiberglass, but I cannot find any data on this. Fiberglass is measured in wall cavities (STC) and mineral wool is measured alone? (NRC). Do yuo any experience with this claim? I am considering mineral wool for in ceiling/wall in a home theater.

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 5 месяцев назад

      A very good question, sir! No insulation fiber has been measured "alone" for STC. For building purposes and soundproofing, use either type. However, for acoustic treatment laboratory tests have shown that Fiberglass insulation (in all its forms) will outperform Rockwool when comparing density to density and thickness to thickness. 😎

    • @swampweed833
      @swampweed833 2 месяца назад

      look at sound absorption coefficients of those different materials, they should publish the data or 3rd party has published their independent testing. video is a completely misinformation

  • @eltute1
    @eltute1 6 месяцев назад

    WOW WOW WOW, man.....this sessions are insanely vigorizing. It just makes you want to dig it more and more. Keep it comming please. For the ones like me that don't have anyone to discuss this kind of stuff it's life saving. Thanks to all of you, each one of you looks so commited to share information that is so difficult to get FOR FREE that it blows my mind. Really thank you so much for the time you have give us!!!!!!!!! Greetings from Uruguay!

  • @audioman99
    @audioman99 7 месяцев назад

    Boy, I tried every ratio option for my 8' ceilings, but I couldn't get anything less than .29 seconds RT60. Any suggestions John?

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 6 месяцев назад

      What are your dimensions? NOTE: ratios, by themselves, don't always work. Send me an email and let's talk. john@jhbrandt.net

    • @audioman99
      @audioman99 6 месяцев назад

      Thank you John. I'll get in touch soon.@@JHBrandt

  • @stephenborgovini
    @stephenborgovini 7 месяцев назад

    Hi John, Thank you for these videos. You mention painting a concrete wall to seal it. What kind of paint do you recommend?

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 7 месяцев назад

      Use an exterior grade emulsion. We need an airtight seal because where air can go, so goes sound.

  • @DG-vo8yc
    @DG-vo8yc 7 месяцев назад

    Thanks @jhbrandt You mentioned that very high quality carpet padding reduces footfall well. Is there a brand you recommend?

  • @TCSound
    @TCSound 7 месяцев назад

    Dear John, I am using a mac and I can't transfer the data change with the command control+shift+S(on mac this is Save as...), is there anyway I can do this from menu commands? sorry to ask, the chart is not functional otherwise

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 7 месяцев назад

      No, I'm sorry. You must have MS Office for the macros to work. I had someone in my Facebook group give advice on making these spreadsheets work in Open Office and other Microsoft clones but I don't know it. 😝 If you need to talk to me, please send an email to john@jhbrandt.net

  • @LowCoSuzukiGuitar
    @LowCoSuzukiGuitar 7 месяцев назад

    I have a second story timber house and I'm finishing the 2nd floor attic band rehearsal/live room. For DIY, seems like the more affordable option is just to add some gypsum and two 3/4 OSB laters to the floor, maybe some gym mat in between. Am I wrong? This could be done for $1,500 as opposed to hiring a $3,000 consultant, a $3,000 structural engineer to tell me that I can't pour a slab up there. Assuming I can't do a slab, are there many other options? The rubber U-float sounds like a problem waiting to happen (additional resonance). If I take the cheap DIY, my wife may still be able to hear my band rehearsing but ultimately I don't want her to hear my acoustic guitar practice late at night. If I have the money down the road, and my DIY floor is a failure, I could pull up the plywood/gyp/osb floor and consult someone.... appreciate any advice!

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 7 месяцев назад

      An Impact resistant flooring as you described might help a little but I think you'll be disappointed. I offer a FREE consultation for the first meeting (30 minutes). And you can get a quote for design from me. I can't really speculate what you need from what you wrote - I need more information. And you should do some testing. (I'll recommend) Send me an email - john@jhbrandt.net

  • @EssubW
    @EssubW 8 месяцев назад

    "You can put a sh***y speaker in this room and it sounds good." This is one phenomena that people really need to hear to understand. I have a small decently DIY treated listening room / synth den and it's a fun experiment to show to people who say "You have good speakers": Switch speakers off and listen through a beverage can sized bluetooth speaker, a kitchen radio, heck even laptop speakers sound surprisingly good, considering what they are.

  • @pawelsobaszek6363
    @pawelsobaszek6363 8 месяцев назад

    Unfortunately URSA SF38 is not 38kg/m3. It has nominal value of thermal conductivity λD = 0.038 W/mK, and the density probably below 20kg/m3. There are some products that should be better- Knauf unifit 032 - 34kg/m3, λD = 0.032 W/mK , Isover multimax 30 - 40kg/m3, λD = 0.030 W/mK. I would look for λD <= 0.032 W/mK, as its density should be around 30+kg/m3. Rockwool usually has higher λD for the same density compared to glasswool.

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 8 месяцев назад

      Rockwool does NOT perform as well as fiberglass. Thanks for the information about Isover multimax 30! That's the stuff to buy! We have tested many of these products both glasswool and rockwool. Glasswool outperforms every time.

  • @cappaciono18
    @cappaciono18 8 месяцев назад

    Great resource for Europeans 😊🇪🇺 Greetings from Poland 🇵🇱

  • @Vlad_on_Zero_Degrees
    @Vlad_on_Zero_Degrees 8 месяцев назад

    NathanOakley1980 reviewed your video - worth a watch.

  • @moxy5708
    @moxy5708 8 месяцев назад

    Hey fellas 3 or4 grown men that think the earth is flat are about to enter your comments, just ignore and block them. 👍

  • @NathanOakley1980
    @NathanOakley1980 8 месяцев назад

    Live your channel, and your info. I’ll be covering this on my show tomorrow, I really hope some people come your way for the right reason. They will let you know I sent them.

  • @NathanOakley1980
    @NathanOakley1980 8 месяцев назад

    7:22 umm, gravity hasn’t been a force to “stop you floating away” for 108 years, “Gravity is not a force.......but.....YOU CAN *think* of it as a force” George Musser 2019 ... the height of double speak. “gravity is not a force” George Musser 2019. Gravity is the bending of a conceptual meduim known as “space time”. You can’t bend concepts, and thinking about it will never give rise to any force. “There isn’t really a force of gravity at all” Professor Brian Cox The “legislators” still need the idea of gravity to be prevalent among the people. Gas behaviour, described by the second law of thermodynamics defies this out of date “theory” (it isn’t that either). Gas expands in all directions and is not effected by pseudo-geometry of Einstein’s 4d space time bending. Audio is 10 years behind, pseudo physics (taught by consensus and *not* “science”) is 108 years behind. Einstein superseded Newtonian *forces* holding us to a ball quite some time ago, doesn’t it blow your mind 😆

    • @NathanOakley1980
      @NathanOakley1980 8 месяцев назад

      Does the gas the sound travels through go down because of gravity too 😆 Nope! Gas behaviour defies gravity… a bent 4d space time invented by Einstein 😜

  • @NathanOakley1980
    @NathanOakley1980 8 месяцев назад

    4:30 never has a more true statement been uttered!

  • @robinhood5135
    @robinhood5135 9 месяцев назад

    i dont get whats the big problem to get data reg the VPR`s? its just the polyester stuff + cold rolled steel plates. put the stuff in rons lab and voila.

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 9 месяцев назад

      Yes, please! Somebody pay to have it done. I spent about $30k getting testing done and shall probably spend another 30k. Do it. Then we will know if they work or not. From experience and data on how these things work... the VPR things probably don't work very well at all.

  • @joonasvahasalo6635
    @joonasvahasalo6635 9 месяцев назад

    Ok.... why did 2 of my comments get deleted here ? Is this normal on this channel if you challenge the narrative ?

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 9 месяцев назад

      what got deleted?

  • @joonasvahasalo6635
    @joonasvahasalo6635 9 месяцев назад

    He is talking about pressure but porous absorbers work with velocity

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 9 месяцев назад

      Listen closely again... The trapped air behind the absorber can work as a pressure device. It will increase the absorption with a lower knee point.

  • @teamdada2194
    @teamdada2194 9 месяцев назад

    I’ve seen his mug on multiple forums saying nothing works. Cmon dude

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 9 месяцев назад

      prove me wrong asshole. There are things that work and things that don't work. You "choose" to believe things that are not true.

  • @bluehorizon5149
    @bluehorizon5149 9 месяцев назад

    Total IDIOT ...................... ALERT !!!

  • @bluehorizon5149
    @bluehorizon5149 9 месяцев назад

    FOOL, ... Exteriour Rockwool and plasterboard STOP REALLY LOUD NOISE...... This is a Fact, you are daft.

  • @bluehorizon5149
    @bluehorizon5149 9 месяцев назад

    .......... and you ARE, A LIAR ! 100% YOU ARE AN IDIOT, YOU KNOW NOTHING FOOL, NOTHING !

  • @bluehorizon5149
    @bluehorizon5149 9 месяцев назад

    Dude, YOU are talking shite. YOU sir, are A Fool !

  • @edmc2
    @edmc2 9 месяцев назад

    😎

  • @leforce666
    @leforce666 9 месяцев назад

    John helped me design a home studio that is amazing and was really an amazing experience.

  • @carolsummers1790
    @carolsummers1790 9 месяцев назад

    Promo sm 🤩

  • @martinvitvar3101
    @martinvitvar3101 9 месяцев назад

    At first it looks like a nice presentation with graphs which is rare. At the second look not very much. Firstly you don't have Schroeder frequency at 41 Hz in your lab but rather at least at 282 Hz. To reach 41 Hz Schoerder you would have to have 0,12 s RT60 with 210 Sabins in the room. Therefore there would be no diffuse field, nor could you measure adding 20 more Sabins into the room accurately. The ISO norm states for 281m3 you can have 8,15 Sabins in an emty room at maximum. So the basics are wrong. The vast differences when reasonators placed in different positions furthermore support the basics beeing wrong. Not sure how customer relevant tilting the panels is, when nobody uses it this way. Measurements shown are not valid for other rooms, since the effect will be very different according to room size and placement. Graphs should not be called Sabins at all. There can be a discussion of how to measure it and I support it and will gladly contribute to it. But this seeems to be presented as a breakthrough which is not. Only the placement is optimised for highest absorption on graph not real world usage. I have actually seen this type of measurements done many times by other companies, as a over the line marketing. Once you step out of the rules you have to be very carefull how you define things. I do not think this is transferable to other rooms. So you will not be able to do accurate calculations with this measurements. Please take this note as a constructive criticism, I know it is sensitive and difficult topic. I am beeing honest here as an engineer to an engineer.

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 9 месяцев назад

      Martin, You have a point about the Schroeder Frequency. The other things you mentioned are just wrong. I work with many people who do laboratory testing, design labs, sit on standards committees, etc. You don't. We're doing science AND we're working in an area where no one has gone before. Ron and others are working on presentations to describe what was learned at the laboratory to present to the standards committees. In this video, Richard is discussing what he learned during the process. It may take years for standards to catch up and acknowledge the verifiable and repeatable data. It IS a breakthrough. And you haven't seen this done anywhere before because there are no laboratories capable of testing this low. Watch the video again. Listen and learn.

    • @martinvitvar3101
      @martinvitvar3101 9 месяцев назад

      @@JHBrandt there is a diference when somebody presents the results as measurement irregularities trying to decompose the result into particulate factors influencing the measurement. This aproach is the right way to show and tell about the results. This is the way Ron Sauro does it. In this presentation Richard Lenz makes basically the argument, that this one measurement with tilted panels and lots of space behind and inbetween the panels gives higher absorption, therefore it is right. This is backwards. It only shows the maximum edge effect. With the tilting and large space behing panels it is impossible to state the sample area (which is not front face area in this case). Therefore impossible to calculate Sabins accurately. A lot of manufacturers use this kind of measurement to prop up the graphs. Usually not even bothering to state the measurement conditions (as this is omited in later graphs of the presentation). Which means it is worth nothing. When you want to make such a large changes to ISO normalized mounting condition (which are very particulate about sealing all the joints, sides and back of panels with borders and tape to the room) you have to check for validity of it first. Here are the mounting conditions ignored and used for numbers maximalisaion instead. Ron Sauro's aproach is the right way - checking the placement with dummy panels made of full chunks of steel - checking for edge effect - trying to discern the individual contributions of different physical effects to the total absorption measured - checking for spacing patterns influence. This one piece by Richard Lenz is based on circular definition - change everything so the measurement gives higher numbers - therefore it is the right way to measure. This is fundamentally wrong aprocach - you don't know what gives the higher numbers and how (unknown surface area (back side absorption efect unknown), side asorption, tilting, spacing, corner placement). If you chose to present the results and to discuss about it what does it - it could be fruitful in LF edge effect description. There is a long way before you can call any of this a real measurement.

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 9 месяцев назад

      @@martinvitvar3101 that's not what was being done. You misunderstood. Ron and I have already gone over all of this. It was Ron's idea to place them like that. There is no sealed tube behind the tested diaphragmatic traps this way. Why don't you take this up with the standards committee - Both Ron and Richard are on the committee. ☺

    • @richardlenz9007
      @richardlenz9007 9 месяцев назад

      Martin, I just saw your post and found it.... interesting. John is right, all this testing was done in Ron Sauro's NWAA labs. Where you fall short in your analysis is to say that the placement is not "real world". Point in fact, it is the attempt to use ASTM C423 standards that is not real world for testing frequencies under 125Hz. Bass traps are nearly always used in modal zones of rooms, primarily corners and walls. Reverberation chambers, under C423 or ISO354, are designed to be used with the test samples in the diffuse zone of the lab, which, in the case of C423, is .75 meters from the walls. Diaphragmatic bass traps are not used in diffuse zones, period. They are designed to control modal frequencies. For this reason, we chose to put them in the spaces where the modal frequencies exist. That should make sense to anyone that understands the behavior of modes. Ron's lab is qualified down to 20Hz, so we were well within the boundaries of the models tested. For the record, if we had the capability of testing these flat to the walls, we would have. However, NWAA's lab has a 3/4" conduit around the entire perimeter, which prevented this. Tilting the units was the only way to get rid of the back pressure caused by the 3/4" space behind them, which, as I indicated, caused a nasty 50Hz spike that was not part of the actual performance. I have been on the ASTM E33 committee for over 10 years. I sit on the C423 committee as well. I would argue that this testing may be the most consistent and accurate use of a reverberation chamber. It does not rely on whether or not the lab has a really "diffuse" field, inasmuch as this is a a sticky point in a lot of labs. This is why round robin tests can have a lot a varibles, among other reasons. This test method does not rely on the diffuse field, and therefore the empty room/full room offset is much more likely to be accurate. I could site more examples, but after 3 years of experimentation, both good and bad, I can attest to the efficacy of this methodology. We will be presenting it at our next ASTM meeting as an addendum to the standard.

    • @martinvitvar3101
      @martinvitvar3101 8 месяцев назад

      @@richardlenz9007 You have mentioned your lab at Real Acoustics and shown visualisation of modal field for it. It is not mentioned the measurement was done at NWAA - this is confusing. NWAA lab size is 12,65 m by 11,28 m by 6,1 m. It think at this point the measurement provided proves the lab is not diffuse field down to 25 Hz. What the diffuse field actually is or how to asses it is another part of story I am not going here for the sake of length. Diapragmatic absorbers are quite nonlinear. Meaning horizontal vs vertical position makes a big difference both in frequency and efficiency. So I am not suprised it is much more efficient when used standing up. That is also my concern when used in tilted mode - band and efficiency will be different when vertically mounted as usuall. I would hope by now you and Ron would subtract the edge effect. There are to many unresolved issues here - tilted angle, spacing, not sure how we can continue calling this reverb chamber measurement using standard diffuse field method. Using absorption formula for volume of the room seems wrong when not all of the room participates the same. At least it would be useull to prove, that the different number of LF devices has the same average effect. I suspect not, meaning it is another hole in the story. I suspect more devices will have disproportionally less effect, because of the modal field. This is a lot of work and money to do and standardize, I wish you well at your journey.

  • @donferguson5521
    @donferguson5521 9 месяцев назад

    Great info. I have always placed my 2" thick absorptions panels against the walls. These are my 1st, 2nd refection absorption panels. I have a cloud which does have an air gap about 2-4" off the ceiling. I have a thin carpet in the back of the room to help with some of the reflection off the floor to ceiling. I also have bass traps in all 4 corners. the final panel i have is a 4x8 panel with 4" thick rockwool. this seems to all work pretty good. I am not an expert I just listen and decide if I like it.

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 9 месяцев назад

      Don, please join my FB group. We discuss advanced absorption techniques. facebook.com/groups/517162262483268 Don't forget to agree to the rules. 😁

  • @NathanOakley1980
    @NathanOakley1980 9 месяцев назад

    That’s how the off the shelf GIK panels are designed. They have a 1” enclosed air gap behind the absorption.

  • @WarrenWatsonActor
    @WarrenWatsonActor 9 месяцев назад

    Interesting video. I started writing this here but I'll email this to you instead but I thought I'd leave this up for anyone else interested...I'm interested in more info about the sound absorption that you mentioned at the 24:44 mark, absorbing 80-500Hz. I have a GretchKen booth that's 6x4 and I've noticed some low frequency reflection. I currently have the booth covered with Rockwool Safe & Sound and some cotton fabric covering that. The one exception is the roof, I haven't gotten to that yet. The booth was used when I bought and the original sound foam was deteriorating and after reading other VO talent using Rockwool I decided to use it. I think if I can just eliminate or at least reduce the low freq reflection I'd be happy.

    • @BogdanWeiss
      @BogdanWeiss 7 месяцев назад

      Interesting that the Gretchken booths appear to offer isolation, but from what you are saying, little in terms of optimal design of the isolated internal acoustics.... A half baked solution, I would expect a bit more given their price...

  • @zeitakulobusta9708
    @zeitakulobusta9708 9 месяцев назад

    How do Peter's results sound to you John? Also would be v interested to hear actual recordings from Peter's room. Also did Peter do any before/after measurements? Exciting times ;)

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 9 месяцев назад

      I'll ask him to post an example recording. 👍

  • @bartlomiejzajkowski9259
    @bartlomiejzajkowski9259 9 месяцев назад

    What is a waveguide? Is it a perforated panel on top?

    • @JHBrandt
      @JHBrandt 9 месяцев назад

      A very good question. A wave guide is described as a board mass surrounded with rigid fiber. The idea was from Tom Hidley and Philip Newell. Philip claimed to test it. We've recently done laboratory testing on these things annnnddd... They don't work like they have been described. Therefore, we don't do "wave guides" anymore. 🙄 The ceiling treatment or trapping in a control room is STILL the most important trap for the entire mixing room. Please join me in my Facebook group - facebook.com/groups/517162262483268/?ref=share to learn more about advanced acoustics and what we're learning from laboratory testing 😁